Subject: Cambridge Lower Secondary Global Perspectives & English (Stage 8)


Venue: Bannerghatta National Park Zoo with Hakki-Pikki Community
Program Type: Half-Day Ethical and Civic Field Inquiry
Age Group: 13–14 years
Duration: Half Academic Day
Focus: Human rights, social justice, ethical responsibility, environmental stewardship and civic action


Program Overview:

This field inquiry positions the Hakki-Pikki community and Bannerghatta National Park as interconnected case studies for analysing fairness, justice and systemic responsibility within society.

Students critically examine how social, economic and environmental systems distribute power and resources. Through structured dialogue, perspective analysis and ethical evaluation, learners assess how human decisions influence both communities and ecosystems.

The inquiry progression follows:
Ethical Framing → Perspective Investigation → Systems Analysis → Justice Evaluation → Civic Action Proposal

Students gather first-hand evidence, compare viewpoints, evaluate systemic fairness and construct principled, evidence-based arguments.


Cambridge Curriculum Alignment:

Cambridge Lower Secondary Global Perspectives (Stage 8):
• Analyse issues of fairness and justice using multiple perspectives
• Evaluate the impact of social and environmental systems
• Construct reasoned arguments supported by evidence
• Propose realistic and responsible actions

Cambridge Lower Secondary English (Stage 8):
• Develop structured analytical responses
• Use evidence to justify viewpoints
• Engage in reasoned discussion and debate

Cambridge Lower Secondary Science (Stage 8 – environmental strand):
• Analyse human impact on ecosystems
• Evaluate sustainability and environmental responsibility


Learning Objectives:

Students will:
• Analyse fairness and justice within real community systems
• Evaluate the ethical responsibilities of governments and individuals
• Examine environmental justice and human–wildlife relationships
• Compare perspectives across stakeholders
• Construct a justified civic action response


Learning Outcomes:

Students will:
• Identify systemic inequalities supported by field evidence
• Analyse at least two contrasting perspectives
• Evaluate the ethical implications of development decisions
• Present a structured argument using real observations
• Propose a feasible civic or environmental action initiative


Assessment Objectives Mapping:

AO1: Research and Enquiry – Gather structured field evidence
AO2: Analysis – Compare perspectives and examine systemic relationships
AO3: Evaluation – Judge fairness, responsibility and long-term impact
AO4: Communication – Construct coherent, evidence-based arguments


 

    Enquiry with us

  • Forward the quote